https://discord.gg/jyPTxUb
Feeling lost? Have nowhere to go after tumblr has banned you for your hand holding fetish? Don’t fret and hang out in the Fox Den with all the other purge survivors <3 We have cookies and lewds!
https://discord.gg/jyPTxUb
Feeling lost? Have nowhere to go after tumblr has banned you for your hand holding fetish? Don’t fret and hang out in the Fox Den with all the other purge survivors <3 We have cookies and lewds!
https://discord.gg/jyPTxUb
Category Artwork (Digital) / Doodle
Species Daemon
Gender Female
Size 951 x 1200px
We shall make Tumblr Suffer for becoming a prudish PTA mom all to eager to set to high republican values of sexual repression and getting surgery to revirginize herself
Don't blame us Republicans for this; we called the denizens of that site Tumblrinas for a reason. :-P
Oh golly gee as if republican senators aren't pushing anti-porn bans in more than 7 states and literally mimics the stancse of ingsoc on sexual identification and expression XD. Who the fuck you kidding and Lol Way too late a year in response *Slow Clap* .
as if republican senators aren't pushing anti-porn bans in more than 7 states
Considering the GOP holds 38 state legislatures, I'm happy only 7 states are considering anti-porn (what kind? Live or drawn?) bans.
Contrast the Democrats, who only hold 12 legislatures, yet have instituted college campus sex kangaroo courts across the USA:
https://pjmedia.com/instapundit/goo.....an-what-it-sa/
Ridiculous.
and literally mimics the stancse of ingsoc on sexual identification and expression
Ingsoc pushed anti-love and anti-sex policies on workers and outer Party members, and then fed violence-and-guilt-infused pr0n to the proles. I don't see this becoming part of the GOP platform anytime soon.
Also: IdPol is cancer. I would not be proud of pushing who-you-f__k-identitarianism so hard that people with low drives for sex or promiscuity felt the need to create an identity group to protect themselves.
Considering the GOP holds 38 state legislatures, I'm happy only 7 states are considering anti-porn (what kind? Live or drawn?) bans.
Contrast the Democrats, who only hold 12 legislatures, yet have instituted college campus sex kangaroo courts across the USA:
https://pjmedia.com/instapundit/goo.....an-what-it-sa/
Ridiculous.
and literally mimics the stancse of ingsoc on sexual identification and expression
Ingsoc pushed anti-love and anti-sex policies on workers and outer Party members, and then fed violence-and-guilt-infused pr0n to the proles. I don't see this becoming part of the GOP platform anytime soon.
Also: IdPol is cancer. I would not be proud of pushing who-you-f__k-identitarianism so hard that people with low drives for sex or promiscuity felt the need to create an identity group to protect themselves.
Yes I'm sure the leftwing that side of politics who have been pushing for free love since the 60s, gay legalization, interracial marriage and have commonly been called deviants suddenly and magically changed their entire way of thinking and found it in their hearts to take up the Puritan cause mostly found in conservative areas.
I'm not a fan of democrats since they're a fake left party intent on shielding republicans but seriously XD lol but if there is any group close to the ideals ingsoc then maybe consider that even the writer of 1989 Orwell commented on how the rightwing parties are closer to such ideals. XD Like dude come on you're at a website where the Majority of people here have been harassed all their lives for being furries By right wingers and republicans who the fuck are you kidding?
I'm not a fan of democrats since they're a fake left party intent on shielding republicans but seriously XD lol but if there is any group close to the ideals ingsoc then maybe consider that even the writer of 1989 Orwell commented on how the rightwing parties are closer to such ideals. XD Like dude come on you're at a website where the Majority of people here have been harassed all their lives for being furries By right wingers and republicans who the fuck are you kidding?
that even the writer of 1989 Orwell
Mr Eric Arthur Blair was the author of 1984. This is like arguing with an insane person.
The PMRC was founded by Tipper Gore, wife to Democrat VP Al gore. It is the Democrats marching across the country to "deplatform" wrongthink, they who defend cancel culture:
https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/.....tremely-online
https://www.wellandgood.com/good-ad.....ancel-culture/
When Republicans railed against Andres Serrano's 1987 picture of a crucifix in urine, they were ticked off that the "artist" had been paid by the National Endowment for the Arts, i.e., taxpayer dollars. And they were right to do so.
“Support for the arts—merde! A government-supported artist is an incompetent whore!”
― Robert A. Heinlein, Stranger in a Strange Land
Mr Eric Arthur Blair was the author of 1984. This is like arguing with an insane person.
The PMRC was founded by Tipper Gore, wife to Democrat VP Al gore. It is the Democrats marching across the country to "deplatform" wrongthink, they who defend cancel culture:
https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/.....tremely-online
https://www.wellandgood.com/good-ad.....ancel-culture/
When Republicans railed against Andres Serrano's 1987 picture of a crucifix in urine, they were ticked off that the "artist" had been paid by the National Endowment for the Arts, i.e., taxpayer dollars. And they were right to do so.
“Support for the arts—merde! A government-supported artist is an incompetent whore!”
― Robert A. Heinlein, Stranger in a Strange Land
Oh golly gee I guess all those time Republicans called dems, gays, and furries deviant worthless filth that should be burned at the stake for blasphemy against the writhing wenches of women who dare speak out for sexual liberation were all lying. Yes you seem incredibly sincere about your statements that the Right is all about sexual freedom and Heinlein's Stranger in a Strange land LOL that XD is Wow Actually I have someone who can say it better than me. Though honestly i'll admit a bit better than Ann Ryans bs I have Bioshock to critique that still kind of a pretty bad fail https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3jAkplrZci0
worthless filth that should be burned at the stake for blasphemy against the writhing wenches of women who dare speak out for sexual liberation
I'm going to assume there's a missing comma after "blasphemy," since I know of no way to blaspheme mere women. Or men. And I'm not sure what "wenches of women" are, since "wench" means "young human female."
You're making things up, or you think the schizophrenic homeless guy screaming at pedestrians downtown is a senior GOP advisor. Who, exactly, wants to burn you at the stake? Other than the Spanish Inquisition? I'm curious.
I'm going to assume there's a missing comma after "blasphemy," since I know of no way to blaspheme mere women. Or men. And I'm not sure what "wenches of women" are, since "wench" means "young human female."
You're making things up, or you think the schizophrenic homeless guy screaming at pedestrians downtown is a senior GOP advisor. Who, exactly, wants to burn you at the stake? Other than the Spanish Inquisition? I'm curious.
Oh golly gee willikers semantics of grammar fisting and a pathetic white washing ignorance of history. Please anyone whose been around knows enough of your sad tactics to derail the conversation with fallacies and BS its common for cuckservatives to do that its also common for cuckservatives like you to pretend certain aspects of history didn't happen. XD Could you like even try to hide these childish measures. We all know cuckservatives from the Puritians to todays ned flanders leer, with judgement and wanton lust, at anyone who doesn't do it missionary style and has had calls to invading their womb with big government because they Love big government spying for them or just burning them as witches. XD Please Bitch your people are back to lynching their political opponents and giving the same tired smears they use to when black people or women got too uppity. You got nothing real to argue so where is your strawman or red fish you plan to throw out or is it another grammar fisting. All you have is BS lies and fallacies
I'll admit I did like stranger in a strange land but primarily Heinlein was more a libertarian you're taking Liberties here calling him a republican when we put that in modern context. I'd give you 1/2 a point at best since you're being 'liberal' with semantics XD. Thats almost Serendipitous if you Grok it
Also I think this convo is a wee bit too polarized. We need a referee on this for better debate
Also I think this convo is a wee bit too polarized. We need a referee on this for better debate
Comments